Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Yow et al

Filing 39

ORDER denying 18 Motion to Strike, denying 20 Motion to Dismiss, and granting 37 Motion to Stay. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 1/6/2012. (Sawyer, D.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION No.7:11-CV-60-D WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. LIONEL MARK. YOW, LIONEL LEON YOW, and JENNIFER Y. LEECH, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER On January 6,2012, the parties filed ajoint motion of the plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("plaintiff') and defendants Lionel Mark Yow, Lionel Leon Yow, and Jennifer Y. Leech ("defendants") asking that the court stay this proceeding pending approval ofa settlement agreement and to amend or delay all deadlines or requirements ofthe scheduling order pending the anticipated dismissal of this proceeding. Based upon the joint request and representations of counsel as set forth in the motion, the motion [D.E. 37] is GRANTED as follows: all matters in this action are hereby stayed and all deadlines eliminated or held in abeyance pending the conclusion of the settlement approval proceedings in the Bankruptcy Court and the anticipated dismissal with prejudice of this proceeding; PROVIDED THAT IN THE EVENT THAT the settlement is not approved and this case is consequently not dismissed, counsel for the parties are ordered to promptly file a new proposed discovery plan and proposed scheduling order with the court no later than the date 14 days after the settlement is disapproved by the Bankruptcy Court or February 28, 2012, whichever date last occurs. The parties are further directed to report to the court if an objection to the settlement is timely filed in Mr. Yow's Chapter 11 case and the hearing date for resolving such objection. The other pending motions [D.E. 18, 20J are DENIED without prejudice. SO ORDERED. This.J.... day ofJanuary 2012. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?