SunTrust Banks, Inc. v. Sloan Drummonds, Inc. et al
Filing
21
ORDER granting 17 Motion for Entry of Default as to defendants Sloan Drummonds, Inc., Worthmore Financial, Inc. d/b/a Worthmore Properties, and Sloan Drummonds, individually. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 8/9/2011. (Edwards, S.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DMSION
No. 7:11-CV-83-F
SUN TRUST BANK, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
SLOAN DRUMMONDS, INC.;
WORTHMORE FINANCIAL, INC., d/b/a
WORTHMORE PROPERTIES; BAYVIEW
MOTORS AND COMMERCIAL TRUCKS,
INC.; SLOAN DRUMMONDS,
individually; and CRYSTAL
DRUMMONDS, individually,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
This matter is before the court on motion of plaintiff, Sun Trust Bank, Inc. ("Sun Trust"),
for Entry of Default [DE-17] as against defendants Sloan Drummonds, Inc.; Worthmore
Financial, Inc., d/b/a Worthmore Properties; and Sloan Drummonds, individually (hereinafter
"the Drummonds defendants"V The record demonstrates that service of process was had on
all defendants.
The defense attorney who removed this action from Columbus County, North Carolina,
Superior Court to this court on behalf of all defendants filed a Motion to Withdraw [DE-12] as
counsel of record for the Drummonds defendants on June 1, 2011. Attached to his Motion to
Withdraw is a letter purportedly signed by Sloan Drummonds in his individual capacity and in
his capacity as agent for both Sloan Drummonds, Inc., and Worthmore Financial, Inc., d/b/a
Worthmore Properties. Drummonds' letter [DE-12], Exhibit A, states that Mr. Drummonds in
his individual and representative capacities, acknowledges and agrees to the Motion to
Withdraw [DE-12] and to counsel's continued representation of the remaining defendants and
1
Defendants Bayview Motors and Commercial Trucks, Inc. and Crystal Drummonds,
individually, filed an Answer ,see [DE-IS], on June 1, 2011.
waives any resulting conflict, and further acknowledges that the Drummonds defendants must
timely respond to the Amended Complaint unless otherwise directed.
By order of June 1, 2011, the undersigned allowed the Motion to Withdraw, and directed
Sloan Drummonds, Inc. and Worthmore Financial, Inc., d/b/a Worthmore Properties to cause
their substitute counsel to file a Notice of Appearance on or before June 22, 2011. See [DE-14].2
The order further directed Sloan Drummonds, individually, on or before the same date to advise
the court whether he intended to proceed pro se in the action or, alternatively, to appear
through substitute counsel. See id. The record reflects that the withdrawing attorney notified
counsel for Sun Trust that he had provided his three former clients, the Drummonds
defendants, a copy of the court's order permitting him to withdraw as their counsel. See [DEĀ
16].
None of the Drummonds defendants complied with the court's order [DE-14] or sought
additional time within which to do so. On June 24, 2011 - two days after the deadline - Sun
Trust filed the instant Motion for Entry of Default as against the three Drummonds defendants.
No response has been filed and the Drummonds defendants still have not complied with this
court's order.
It appears to the court that the Drummonds defendants have acknowledged and
consented to withdrawal by their lawyer. It further appears that they have acknowledged their
responsibility to respond to Sun Trust's Amended Complaint, yet they have chosen not to do so.
Accordingly, rather than order the Drummonds defendants to show cause why they should not
be held in contempt of court for failure to comply with the order of June 1, 2011, the court elects
instead to ALLOW Sun Trust's Motion for Entry of Default [DE-I?] as against the Drummonds
defendants - specifically, Sloan Drummonds, Inc.; Worthmore Financial, Inc., d/b/a
2 Of course, a corporate entity may not appear in this court except through counsel, as
detailed in the Local Rules (E.D.N.C.).
2
Worthmore Properties; and Sloan Drummonds, individually.
The Clerk of Court hereby is DIRECTED to enter default as against these three
defendants, only. The Clerk further is DIRECTED to continue managing this action as against
defendants Bayview Motors and Commercial Trucks, Inc. and Crystal Drummonds, individually,
according to the procedures adopted by this court.
SO ORDERED.
This the
't
P.
day of August,
2011.
II
e.;Z;
ESC. FOX
enior United States District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?