Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, et al

Filing 84

ORDER granting 80 Motion to Consolidate Cases - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be consolidated with the action now pending before this Court captioned "Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. G.R. Hammonds Roofing, Inc. et al." , Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-98-FL, with all future documents to be filed under Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-187, and that the consolidated action be controlled by the Case Management Order entered in Civil Action No. 7:11-CV 187. [D.E. 72; 7:11-CV-187-FL]. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/24/2012. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 7:11-cv-187-FL HARLEYSVILLE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, ASSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, FIRST FINANCIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, FIRST MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY, and G.R. HAMMONDS, INC. a/k/a G.R. HAMMONDS ROOFING, INC. a/k/a HAMMONDS ROOFING, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter having come before the Court upon Plaintiff Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company’s Unopposed Motion to Consolidate in the above-captioned lawsuit, pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be consolidated with the action now pending before this Court captioned “Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. G.R. Hammonds Roofing, Inc. et al.”, Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-98-FL, with all future documents to be filed under Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-187, and that the consolidated action be controlled by the Case Management Order entered in Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-187. [D.E. 72; 7:11-CV-187-FL]. October 24 SO ORDERED, this the ___ day of ________________, 2012. LOUISE W. FLANAGAN United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?