Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, et al
Filing
84
ORDER granting 80 Motion to Consolidate Cases - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be consolidated with the action now pending before this Court captioned "Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. G.R. Hammonds Roofing, Inc. et al." , Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-98-FL, with all future documents to be filed under Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-187, and that the consolidated action be controlled by the Case Management Order entered in Civil Action No. 7:11-CV 187. [D.E. 72; 7:11-CV-187-FL]. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/24/2012. (Baker, C.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 7:11-cv-187-FL
HARLEYSVILLE MUTUAL
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
HARTFORD CASUALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY,
HARTFORD FIRE
INSURANCE COMPANY,
ASSURANCE COMPANY
OF AMERICA,
FIRST FINANCIAL
INSURANCE COMPANY,
FIRST MERCURY
INSURANCE COMPANY,
and G.R. HAMMONDS, INC.
a/k/a G.R. HAMMONDS
ROOFING, INC. a/k/a
HAMMONDS ROOFING,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
This matter having come before the Court upon Plaintiff Harleysville Mutual Insurance
Company’s Unopposed Motion to Consolidate in the above-captioned lawsuit, pursuant to
Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be consolidated with the action now pending
before this Court captioned “Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. G.R. Hammonds
Roofing, Inc. et al.”, Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-98-FL, with all future documents to be filed
under Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-187, and that the consolidated action be controlled by the
Case Management Order entered in Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-187. [D.E. 72; 7:11-CV-187-FL].
October
24
SO ORDERED, this the ___ day of ________________, 2012.
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?