Worthington v. Astrue

Filing 53

JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered September 12, 2012, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. This matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the court's final order. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 9/12/2012. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION MARGARET RASCOE WORTHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT No. 7:11-CV-207-FL Decision by Court. This action came before the Honorable Louise W. Flanagan, United States District Judge, for consideration of the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court’s order entered September 12, 2012, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. This matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the court’s final order. This Judgment Filed and Entered on September 12, 2012, and Copies To: James B. Gillespie, Jr. (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Kathleen C. Buckner (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) September 12, 2012 JULIE A. RICHARDS, CLERK /s/ Christa N. Baker (By) Christa N. Baker, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?