United States of America v. Suntrust Bank Money Market Account et al
Filing
10
DEFAULT JUDGMENT as to Defendant signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 12/5/2012. (Sawyer, D.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
NO.
7:12-CV-48-D
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
)
SUNTRUST BANK MONEY MARKET
)
ACCOUNT NUMBERED 1000079046610,)
VALUED AT $4,730.88
)
)
AND
)
SUNTRUST BANK CHECKING ACCOUNT
NUMBERED 0000005035716,
VALUED AT $3,818.08,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for
Default Judgment.
It appearing that a copy of the Complaint
herein was served upon the potential claimant of the defendants
and that publication has been duly made, in accordance with
Supplemental Rule G(4), and, thus, that due notice was given
according
1.
, the Court finds that:
Process was duly issued in this cause and the defendants
were duly seized by the U. S. Marshal's Service pursuant to said
process;
1
2.
No entitled persons have filed any claim to the
defendants nor answer regarding them within the time fixed by
law; and
3.
The well-plead al
ions of the Complaint in respect
to the defendants are taken as admitted, as no one has appeared
to deny the same.
Based upon the above findings,
it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1.
Default judgment be and the same is he
entered
against the defendants;
2.
All persons claiming any
to the said defendants are held
3.
, title, or interest in or
default;
The defendants are forfeited to the United States of
America;
Court entered Default in this action at Docket
4.
Entry #
5.
Cf
;
The U. S. Marshal's Service is hereby directed to
dispose of the defendants according to law; and
2
6.
Upon the entry of this judgment, the Clerk of Court is
DIRECTED to close this case.
SO ORDERED this
S
day of
"b C2C~MJH.. r
, 2012.
JUDGE
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?