UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. McCarty Personal Property
Filing
9
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA against A 1994 Nissan Skyline, McCarty Personal Property, Specifically Described As A 1994 Nissan Skyline. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 9/26/2012. (Edwards, S.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
NO.
7:12-CV-113-F
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
McCARTY PERSONAL PROPERTY,
SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS:
A 1994 NISSAN SKYLINE,
VIN: ECR 33030020, AND ANY AND
ALL PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF SAID
PROPERTY,
Defendant.
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for
Default Judgment.
It appearing that a copy of the Complaint
herein was served upon the potential claimant of the defendant
and that publication has been duly made, in accordance with
Supplemental Rule G(4), and, thus, that due notice was given
accordingly, the Court finds that:
1.
Process was duly issued in this cause and the defendant
was duly seized by the U. S. Customs and Border Protection
pursuant to said process;
1
2.
No entitled persons have filed any claim to the
defendant nor answer regarding them within the time fixed by
lawj and
3.
The well-plead allegations of the complaint in respect
to the defendant are taken as admitted, as no one has appeared
to deny the same.
Based upon the above findings, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1.
Default judgment be and the same is hereby entered
against the defendantj
2.
All persons claiming any right, title, or interest in
or to the said defendant are held in defaultj
3.
The defendant is forfeited to the United States of
Americaj and
4.
The U. S. Customs and Border Protection is hereby
directed to dispose of the defendant according to law.
SO ORDERED this 26th day of September, 2012.
J
S
STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?