Mobley v. Astrue
Filing
33
CONSENT ORDER granting 32 Motion for Attorney Fees - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 01/28/2013. (Baker, C.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
7:12-CV-135-FL
GREGORY CHRIS MOBLEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CONSENT ORDER
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the
parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent
Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant
United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of
Social Security should pay the sum of $4,248.00 for attorney fees, in full and final settlement of
all claims due against the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees and costs arising
under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the
sum of $4,248.00, sent to Plaintiff’s Counsel’s office address, in full satisfaction of any and all
claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is
dismissed with prejudice.
This ___ day of ___________, 2013.
28th
January
_________________________________
United States District Judge
CONSENTED TO:
DERRICK KYLE ARROWOOD
Attorney for Plaintiff
N.C. Bar # 41075
Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 791-1886
derrick@charleshallfirm.com
JAMIE DIXON
Attorney for Defendant
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
Altmeyer Building Room 617
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Telephone: (410) 965-9080
Facsimile: (410) 597-0137
E-mail: Jamie.Dixon@ssa.gov
New York Bar
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?