Mobley v. Astrue

Filing 33

CONSENT ORDER granting 32 Motion for Attorney Fees - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 01/28/2013. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION 7:12-CV-135-FL GREGORY CHRIS MOBLEY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of $4,248.00 for attorney fees, in full and final settlement of all claims due against the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees and costs arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the sum of $4,248.00, sent to Plaintiff’s Counsel’s office address, in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice. This ___ day of ___________, 2013. 28th January _________________________________ United States District Judge CONSENTED TO: DERRICK KYLE ARROWOOD Attorney for Plaintiff N.C. Bar # 41075 Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C. P.O. Box 10629 Raleigh, NC 27605 Telephone: (919) 791-1883 Fax: (919) 791-1886 JAMIE DIXON Attorney for Defendant Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel Altmeyer Building Room 617 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21235-6401 Telephone: (410) 965-9080 Facsimile: (410) 597-0137 E-mail: New York Bar

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?