Strickland, et al v. Jackson, et al
Filing
33
ORDER - The court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in controversy among them. Therefore, this matter is DISMISSED subject to the right of any party to file a motion to reopen the case should settlement not be consummated wit hin forty-five (45) days hereof. The parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice on or before Monday, April, 21, 2014. As there appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes, this case is removed from the active docket. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 03/05/2014. (Baker, C.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
No. 7:12-CV-207-FL
MIKE STRICKLAND; JO ALLISON
STRICKLAND; and SARAH
STRICKLAND,
Plaintiffs,
v.
TINA JACKSON, individually, and as an
employee of the City of Clinton, North
Carolina and CITY OF CLINTON,
NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
The court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in controversy among
them. Therefore, this matter is DISMISSED subject to the right of any party to file a motion to
reopen the case should settlement not be consummated within forty-five (45) days hereof. The
parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice on or before Monday,
April, 21, 2014.
As there appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for
statistical purposes, this case is removed from the active docket.
SO ORDERED, this 5th day of March, 2014.
_____________________________
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?