Morrison v. Stuttering Foundation of America - Chairman et al

Filing 24

JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted by Defendants Stuttering Foundation of America, Jane Frazer, and Dr. Dennis Drayna [D.E. 8, 11] are GRANTED. The Complai nt against Defendant Paul Rutz, Jr. is also DISMISSED. Plaintiff's Motions [D.E. 17, 18] lack merit and are DENIED. The Clerk shall close the case. Signed by Debby Sawyer, Deputy Clerk for Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 2/14/2013. A copy of the judgment was mailed to the pro se plaintiff and to the pro se defendant. (Sawyer, D.)

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION DONALD L. MORRISON, Plaintiff, v. STUTTERING FOUNDATION OF AMERICAChairman, JANE FRAZER, President, PAUL RUTZ, JR., and DR. DENNIS DRAYNA, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT CASE NO. 7:12-CV-252-D Decision by the Court: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted by Defendants Stuttering Foundation of America, Jane Frazer, and Dr. Dennis Drayna [D.E. 8, 11] are GRANTED. The Complaint against Defendant Paul Rutz, Jr. is also DISMISSED. Plaintiff’s Motions [D.E. 17, 18] lack merit and are DENIED. The Clerk shall close the case. THE ABOVE JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED TODAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2013 WITH A COPY TO: Donald L. Morrison (via USPS to P.O. Box 3612, Topsail Beach, NC 28445) James C. Adams II (via CM/ECF Electronic Notification) Paul Rutz, Jr., Pro se (via USPS to 2171 Bud Lipscomb Road, Willow Spring, NC 27592) Joshua B. Royster (via CM/ECF Electronic Notification) February 14, 2013 Date JULIE A. RICHARDS, Clerk Eastern District of North Carolina /s/ Debby Sawyer (By) Deputy Clerk Raleigh, North Carolina Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?