Rizor v. Colvin

Filing 30

JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered November 19, 2014, and for the reasons set forth more specifically within the memorandum and recommendation, that plaintiff's motion for judgment o n the pleadings is granted and defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. This matter is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings in accordance with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 11/19/2014. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION THOMAS EDWARD RIZOR, JR., Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT No. 7:13-CV-243-FL Decision by Court. This action came before the Honorable Louise W. Flanagan, United States District Judge, for consideration of the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings and the memorandum and recommendation entered by the United States Magistrate Judge, to which no objections were filed. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court’s order entered November 19, 2014, and for the reasons set forth more specifically within the memorandum and recommendation, that plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. This matter is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings in accordance with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. This Judgment Filed and Entered on November 19, 2014, and Copies To: Brian M. Ricci (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Peter A. Heinlein (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) November 19, 2014 JULIE A. RICHARDS, CLERK /s/ Christa N. Baker (By) Christa N. Baker, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?