Gillis et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
Filing
325
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 125 Motion in Limine as it relates to the topics stipulated by the parties. All topics that were not agreed upon by the parties were ruled on by the court as the issues arose at trial. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 3/6/2019. (Herrmann, L.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CASE No. 7:14-cv-000185-BR
ANNJEANETTE GILLIS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MURPHY-BROWN, LLC, d/b/a
SMITHFIELD HOG PRODUCTION
DIVISION,
Defendant.
Pending before the court is plaintiffs’ Omnibus Motion in
Limine.
ECF No. 125.
In the plaintiffs’ proposed stipulation,
they set out the topics they wanted the parties to agree on or,
in the alternative, the court to rule on.
exhibit. 1.
See ECF No. 125,
The defendant filed a Response in Partial
Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Omnibus Motion in Limine.
141.
ECF No.
The topics raised in plaintiffs’ motion have either been
stipulated by the parties or have been decided by the court’s
written or oral Orders as the issues arose at trial.
Therefore, the plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED, as it relates
to the topics stipulated by the parties.
All topics that were
not agreed upon by the parties were ruled on by the court as the
issues arose at trial.
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all
counsel of record.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th of March, 2019
ENTER:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?