Gillis et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
Filing
326
ORDER denying 259 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying RENEWED ORAL Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 9/27/2019. (Herrmann, L.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CASE NO: 7:14-CV-185-BR
ANNJEANETTE GILLIS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER
MURPHY-BROWN, LLC d/b/a
SMITHFIELD HOG PRODUCTION
DIVISION,
Defendant.
At the conclusion of plaintiffs’ case in chief, on
November 30, 2018, defendant moved for judgment as a matter of law
pursuant to Rule 50(a).
(ECF No. 259).
At the conclusion of
defendant’s case, on December 4, 2018, defendant renewed that
motion for judgment as a matter of law.
on those motions.
The court deferred ruling
Those motions are DENIED.
Should defendant
file a motion under Rule 50(b) or Rule 59, the court will
“decid[e] the legal questions raised by the motion.”
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all
counsel of record.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2019.
ENTER:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?