Gillis et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC

Filing 326

ORDER denying 259 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying RENEWED ORAL Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 9/27/2019. (Herrmann, L.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION CASE NO: 7:14-CV-185-BR ANNJEANETTE GILLIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ORDER MURPHY-BROWN, LLC d/b/a SMITHFIELD HOG PRODUCTION DIVISION, Defendant. At the conclusion of plaintiffs’ case in chief, on November 30, 2018, defendant moved for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Rule 50(a). (ECF No. 259). At the conclusion of defendant’s case, on December 4, 2018, defendant renewed that motion for judgment as a matter of law. on those motions. The court deferred ruling Those motions are DENIED. Should defendant file a motion under Rule 50(b) or Rule 59, the court will “decid[e] the legal questions raised by the motion.” The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record. IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2019. ENTER:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?