Wilder v. Holder

Filing 17

ORDER denying 16 Motion for Relief from Judgment. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 10/7/2015. Copy sent to pro se plaintiff via US Mail to 1101 Chestnut Street, Wilmington, NC 28401. (Romine, L.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
NO. 7:14-CV-215-BO
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,
Plaintiff,
V.

ERIC HOLDER,
Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs second motion made pursuant to Rule 60 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court previously denied plaintiffs first motion
pursuant to Rule 60 in December 2014 because plaintiff offered no extraordinary circumstances
that justified relief nor did he articulate any manifest injustice that would result from the
dismissal of his complaint as frivolous. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed this
Court's ruling in an opinion dated March 19, 2015. The mandate issued on May 11, 2015.
Again, plaintiffs instant motion appears to follow his stream of consciousness, the reader
cannot ascertain any legal issues or factual support for plaintiffs claims, and he does not offer
extraordinary circumstances or factual relief. His motion [DE 16] is properly DENIED. Plaintiff
may not continue to make filings in this case, as it is now closed. Plaintiff is admonished that
continued filings in this closed case will result in an order directing the Clerk of Court to
dispense with the taking into the record of this case any new materials.

SO ORDERED, this__!/_ day

of~2015.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE