Banks v. Colvin
Filing
21
CONSENT ORDER granting 20 Consent Motion for Attorney Fees - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 05/06/2015. (Baker, C.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
7:14-cv-244-FL
ANTHONY BANKS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CONSENT ORDER
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the
parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent
Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant
United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of
Social Security should pay the sum of $4,625.00 for attorney fees, in full and final settlement of
all claims due against the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees arising under the
Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff, the
sum of $4,625.00 in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. §
2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice.
6th
May
This _____ day of ________________, 2015.
_________________________________
United States District Judge
CONSENTED TO:
/s/CHARLOTTE W. HALL
Attorney for Plaintiff
N.C. Bar # 41290
Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 791-1886
charlotte@charleshallfirm.com
/s/DAVID MANSFIELD
Attorney for Defendant
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
Altmeyer Building, Room 617
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Telephone: (410) 966-2305
Fax: (410) 597-0527
David.mansfeild@ssa.gov
Virginia Bar: #80645
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?