Ezzell v. Colvin
Filing
51
JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant pay to Plaintiff the sum of Eleven Thousand, One Hundred Ninety-Eight and 25/100 ($11,198.25), in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under the Equal Acce ss to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). If the award to Plaintiff is not subject to the Treasury Offset Program, payment will be made by check payable to Plaintiff's counsel, Charlotte W. Hall, PO Box 10629, Raleigh, North Carolina 27605, in accordance with Plaintiff's assignment to his attorney of her right to payment of attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/7/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JAMES EZZELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
CASE NO. 7:14-CV-251-D
Decision by Court.
This action came before this Court for ruling as follows.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant pay to Plaintiff the sum of
Eleven Thousand, One Hundred Ninety-Eight and 25/100 ($11,198.25), in full satisfaction of any and all
claims arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). If the award to Plaintiff is not
subject to the Treasury Offset Program, payment will be made by check payable to Plaintiff’s counsel,
Charlotte W. Hall, PO Box 10629, Raleigh, North Carolina 27605, in accordance with Plaintiff’s
assignment to his attorney of her right to payment of attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice
Act.
This Judgment Filed and Entered on September 7, 2017, and Copies To:
Charlotte Williams Hall
(via CM/ECF electronic notification)
Kaba-Kabi A. Kazadi
DATE:
September 7, 2017
(via CM/ECF electronic notification)
PETER A. MOORE, JR., CLERK
(By) /s/ Nicole Briggeman
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?