Ezzell v. Colvin

Filing 51

JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant pay to Plaintiff the sum of Eleven Thousand, One Hundred Ninety-Eight and 25/100 ($11,198.25), in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under the Equal Acce ss to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). If the award to Plaintiff is not subject to the Treasury Offset Program, payment will be made by check payable to Plaintiff's counsel, Charlotte W. Hall, PO Box 10629, Raleigh, North Carolina 27605, in accordance with Plaintiff's assignment to his attorney of her right to payment of attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/7/2017. (Briggeman, N.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES EZZELL, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE CASE NO. 7:14-CV-251-D Decision by Court. This action came before this Court for ruling as follows. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant pay to Plaintiff the sum of Eleven Thousand, One Hundred Ninety-Eight and 25/100 ($11,198.25), in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). If the award to Plaintiff is not subject to the Treasury Offset Program, payment will be made by check payable to Plaintiff’s counsel, Charlotte W. Hall, PO Box 10629, Raleigh, North Carolina 27605, in accordance with Plaintiff’s assignment to his attorney of her right to payment of attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. This Judgment Filed and Entered on September 7, 2017, and Copies To: Charlotte Williams Hall (via CM/ECF electronic notification) Kaba-Kabi A. Kazadi DATE: September 7, 2017 (via CM/ECF electronic notification) PETER A. MOORE, JR., CLERK (By) /s/ Nicole Briggeman Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?