Blackmon v. G.UB.MK Constructors et al

Filing 61

ORDER granting 53 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 6/28/2016. Certified Copy of Order sent to David Blackmon at 1185 Pleasant Grove Church Road Bladenboro, NC 28320 via US Mail. (Briggeman, N.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 7:14-cv-258-D
DAVID BLACKMON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
G.UB.MK CONSTRUCTORS, a joint venture
between WORLEYPARSONS GROUP, INC.,
WILLIAMS PLANT SERVICES, LLC, and URS
CORPORATION (now known as AECOM
Technology Corporation); WORLEYPARSONS
POLESTAR, INC., WORLEYPARSONS OF
NORTH CAROLINA, INC., and ENSAFE, INC.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS
G.UB.MK CONSTRUCTORS, a joint
)
)
venture between WORLEYPARSONS
GROUP, INC., WILLIAMS PLANT
)
SERVICES, LLC, and URS
)
) CORPORATION (now known as AECOM
Technology Corporation);
)
) WORLEYPARSONS POLESTAR, INC.,
and WORLEYPARSONS OF NORTH
)
CAROLINA, INC.’s MOTION TO
)
COMPEL
)
)
)

Before the Court is Defendants G.UB.MK Constructors, a joint venture between
WorleyParsons Group, Inc., Williams Plant Services, LLC, and URS Corporation (now known
as AECOM Technology Corporation); WorleyParsons Polestar, Inc., and WorleyParsons of
North Carolina, Inc.’s Motion to Compel, to which Plaintiff has not responded.

Having

reviewed the submissions related to said motion, the Court finds that an order should be
entered requiring Plaintiff David Blackmon to fully and completely answer and respond to
Defendants’ First Set of Interrogatories and First Request for Production of Documents to
Plaintiff in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff David Blackmon
produce complete responses to Defendants’ Interrogatories and Request for Production of
Documents as follows:
1.

In response to Request No. 2 of Defendants’ First Request for Production of

Documents, Plaintiff shall produce all medical records that were created in connection with his
alleged injuries in this matter including but not limited to all of plaintiff’s pre- and post-incident
primary care physician records, specialist physician records, pulmonary function tests, CT scans,
and fitness-for-duty tests.
2.

In response to Request No. 3 of Defendants’ First Request for Production of

Documents, Plaintiff shall produce all medical records, including all Pulmonary Function Tests
(PFTs) for a 10-year period prior to the incident until and including the present which is the basis
for this lawsuit.
3.

In response to Request No. 6 of Defendants’ First Request for Production of

Documents, Plaintiff shall produce all documents that show, verify or describe any lost wages he
incurred or which will be incurred in the future as a result of the incident which is the basis for
this lawsuit.
4.

In response to Request No. 8 of Defendants’ First Request for Production of

Documents, Plaintiff shall produce all documents or reports relating to any investigation of this
incident by any person or entity.
5.

In response to Request No. 13 of Defendants’ First Request for Production of

Documents, Plaintiff shall produce all notes, diaries, letters, tapes, e-mails or other
documentation generated or maintained by plaintiff concerning the events before, during and
after the incident referred to in the Complaint.
6.

In response to Request No. 17 of Defendants’ First Request for Production of

Documents, Plaintiff shall produce all State and Federal tax returns, including all schedules and
W-2 forms filed, either individually or jointly, for the five years preceding the incident referred
to in the Complaint.

2

7.

In response to Request No. 19 of Defendants’ First Request for Production of

Documents, Plaintiff shall produce all requested documents regarding any past or present claim
for workers’ compensation benefits.
8.

In response to Request No. 32 of Defendants’ First Request for Production of

Documents, Plaintiff shall produce a copy of all requested materials relating to future anticipated
medical expenses.
9.

In response to Request No. 33 of Defendants’ First Request for Production of

Documents, Plaintiff shall produce all requested documentation regarding the amounts actually
paid to satisfy his medical bills, regardless of the source of payment.
10.

In response to Interrogatory No. 15 of Defendants’ First Set of Interrogatories,

Plaintiff shall provide contact information for each and every witness known to Plaintiff who
claims to have seen or heard any statements related to the incident referred to in Plaintiff’s
Complaint.
11.

In response to Interrogatory No. 27 of Defendants’ First Set of Interrogatories,

Plaintiff shall produce documentation regarding any additional financial losses as a result of the
incident referred to in Plaintiff’s Complaint.
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties or extended by the court, Plaintiff shall provide such
discovery within thirty (30) days of the date of this order.
SO ORDERED, this 28th day of June 2016.
____________________________________
KIMBERLY A. SWANK
United States Magistrate Judge

3