Norton v. Rosier et al

Filing 159

JUDGMENT in favor of Jeffrey Rosier against Calvin Tyrone Norton. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that plaintiff DID NOT establish by a preponderance of the evidence that plaintiffs Fourth Amendment rights were violated by defendant Jeffrey Rosier; IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that plaintiff DID NOT establish by the preponderance of the evidence that plaintiff Calvin Tyrone Norton was falsely imprisoned by defendant Jeffrey Rosier. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/14/2019. (Collins, S.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION CALVIN TYRONE NORTON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY ROSIER, in his individual capacity Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT No. 7:14-CV-260-FL Decision by Court and Jury. That this action came before The Honorable Louise Wood Flanagan, United States District Judge, for consideration of the parties cross motions for summary judgment. Subsequent to the court’s ruling as to these motions, the claims in this action were bifurcated with regard to liability and damages and tried by a jury with The Honorable Louise Wood Flanagan presiding, and the jury rendered a verdict fully favorable to the defendant. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that plaintiff DID NOT establish by a preponderance of the evidence that plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment rights were violated by defendant Jeffrey Rosier; IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that plaintiff DID NOT establish by the preponderance of the evidence that plaintiff Calvin Tyrone Norton was falsely imprisoned by defendant Jeffrey Rosier. This Judgment Filed and Entered on February 14, 2019, and Copies To: Shepard D. O’Connell / Julia Ambrose / Shana L. Fulton (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Clay Allen Collier / Norwood P. Blanchard, III (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) February 14, 2019 PETER A MOORE, JR., CLERK /s/ Sandra K. Collins (By) Sandra K. Collins, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?