Norton v. Rosier et al

Filing 93

ORDER granting 91 Motion to Compel. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 5/15/2018. (Collins, S.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 7:14-cv-00260-FL CALVIN TYRONE NORTON, ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA ISSUED TO THE NORTH CAROLINA CRIMINAL JUSTICE EDUCATION AND TRAINING STANDARDS COMMISSION AND FOR LEAVE TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY ROSIER, in his individual capacity, Defendant. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Issued to the North Carolina Criminal Justice Education and Training Standards Commission and for Leave to Take Depositions (the “Motion”). THE COURT, having considered the Motion and documents presented for the Court’s review, and other appropriate matters of record, in its discretion, FINDS and CONCLUDES for good cause shown that the Motion should be GRANTED. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Motion is granted. 2. The Commission shall comply with the terms of the Subpoena issued on April 6, 2018, and 28 shall provide to Plaintiff all requested documents within ____ days of the date of this Order. 3. All documents produced in compliance with the Subpoena shall be designated as “Confidential” and shall not be published, disseminated, or otherwise used in any manner other than in connection with this litigation. 4. Plaintiff has this Court’s Leave to take the deposition testimony of Commission Investigator Judy Kelley and Commission Investigator Jenny Howell. 1 15th May SO ORDERED, this the _____ day of _____________, 2018. ______________________________ HON. LOUISE W. FLANAGAN United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?