Bigelow v. Colvin
Filing
33
CONSENT ORDER granting 32 Consent Motion for Attorney Fees Under EAJA - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/11/2016. (Baker, C.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
No. 7: 15-cv-69-FL
JAMES BIGELOW,
Plaintiff,
v.
)
)
)
)
)
CAROLYN COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
CONSENT ORDER
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the
parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent
Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant
United States Attorney; and it appea1ing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of
Social Security should pay the sum of $3,786.00 for attorney fees, in full and final settlement of
all claims due against the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees arising under the
Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiffs attorney
$3,786.00 for attorney fees if there is no debt that qualifies under the Treasury Offset Program (31
U.S.C. § 3716). If there is such a debt, any fee remaining after offset will be payable to Plaintiff
and delivered to Plaintiffs attorney.
This _ _ day of _ _ _ _ _ _, 2016,
11th
August
United States District Judge
CONSENTED TO:
Isl CHARLOTTE W. HALL
Attorney for Plaintiff
N.C. Bar # 41290
Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 79 1-1886
charlotte@charleshallfinn.com
Isl LEO R. MONTENEGRO
Attorney for Defendant
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Room 655, Altmeyer Building
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21235
Telephone: (41 0) 965-3153
Fax: (410) 597-0527
Leo.R.Montenegro@ssa.gov
New York Bar
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?