Self-Help Ventures Fund v. Powell, et al
Filing
26
DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Eddie N. Powell and Teresa W. Powell - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 6/7/2016. (Baker, C.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
SELF-HELP VENTURES FUND,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No. 7:15-CV-228-FL
EDDIE N. POWELL and wife,
TERESA W. POWELL; and UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
Defendants.
DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST
DEFENDANTS EDDIE N. POWELL and wife, TERESA W. POWELL
THIS MATTER came on to be considered by the undersigned Judge presiding over the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina upon Plaintiff’s Motion for
Default Judgment against Defendants EDDIE N. POWELL and wife, TERESA W.
POWELL. The Court having reviewed the pleadings, with attached exhibits, the respective
arguments of the parties, and the pertinent authorities, the undersigned makes the following
findings of fact and conclusions of law:
1.
Plaintiff Self-Help Ventures Fund (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action on August
14, 2015 by filing a Notice of Lis Pendens and Verified Complaint in the state court action (SelfHelp Ventures Fund v. Eddie N. Powell, et al.; 15-CVS-910, Sampson County, NC).
2.
On or about August 21, 2015, Plaintiff properly served Defendants Eddie N.
Powell and wife, Teresa W. Powell (“the Powells”) with a Civil Summons, Notice of Lis
Pendens, and Verified Complaint via certified mail, return receipt requested, as evidenced by the
Affidavit of Service properly filed in the court record.
3.
On October 14, 2015, a Notice of Removal was filed by the United States
Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Services in the United States District Court of the
Eastern District of North Carolina, said Court having jurisdiction over the subject matter of this
action and Defendants.
4.
On December 17, 2015, Plaintiff filed its Motion for Entry of Default as to the
Powells, along with the Declaration of Amy Hunt.
5.
On January 13, 2016, the Clerk of Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
entered default as to the Powells.
6.
This Court has jurisdiction over both the subject matter and parties in this action.
7.
On or about November 17, 1995, the Powells obtained title to several tracts of real
property as described in that deed recorded in Book 1218, Page 209 of the Sampson County
Public Registry with a legal description of seven tracts of land (“the Deed”).
8.
Tracts 2 and 6 (as described in the Deed) are collectively known as parcel
identification number 08014592505 and currently have a medical building located on it.
Hereinafter, Tracts 2 and 6 (as described in the Deed) will be referred to as “the Medical
Property”.
9.
On or about November 12, 1999, the Powells borrowed $298,000.00 from
Plaintiff, as evidenced by a promissory note (“the Note”) and secured by that deed of trust
recorded on February 18, 2000 in Book 1351, Page 32 of the Sampson County Public Registry
(“the Deed of Trust”).
10.
All parties to the Deed of Trust transaction intended that the Deed of Trust would
encumber the Medical Property; however, as a result of a mutual mistake of the parties and/or a
scrivener’s error, the Deed of Trust describes only Tracts 6 and 7 from the Deed and omits Tract
2, as intended by all parties. In essence, the legal description in the Deed of Trust describes only
half of the Medical Property, instead of the entire Medical Property, as intended by all parties.
11.
The Powells remain the record owners of the other half of the Medical Property
(Tract 2 as described in the Deed).
12.
Plaintiff remains the current holder of the Note and beneficiary of the Deed of
Trust.
13.
Plaintiff did not discover, and could not reasonably have discovered, the error in
the legal description in the Deed of Trust until in or about March of 2014.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Default
Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants EDDIE N. POWELL and wife,
TERESA W. POWELL, and it is hereby ordered as follows:
(1)
The Court hereby declares that the Deed of Trust is reformed to reflect the intent
of the parties by reforming the legal description in the Deed of Trust to include the entire
Medical Property as follows:
TRACT 2:
BEGINNING at a point in the North edge of Roseboro Street and
the West edge of West Street in the Northwest corner of said street
and runs Westwardly with the North edge of Roseboro Street 25 ½
feet to the center of S.B. Stevens and Lula J. Stevens wall; thence
Northwardly with the center of S.B. Stevens and Lula Stevens wall
60 feet to the end of said wall and past the end of said wall 10 feet
to a stake, Stevens corner; thence Eastwardly parallel with
Roseboro Street 25 ½ feet to a stake in the west edge of West
Street; thence southwardly with the west edge of West Street 70
feet to the BEGINNING corner, making a lot 25 ½ x 70 feet.
TRACT 6:
BEING a part of Lot #7 as laid down in the original map or plat of
the Town of Roseboro, said map or plat being duly and properly
recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds of Sampson
County, reference to which said map or plat is hereby made, and
being that part of Lot No. seven as per the following description,
to-wit:
BEGINNING at a point on the North edge of Roseboro Street 47 ½
feet from the Northwest corner of Roseboro and West Streets in
the center of A.J. Simmons’ wall and runs Northerly with the
center of A.J. Simmons’ brick wall and past the end of his wall 70
feet to a stake; thence Easterly parallel with Roseboro Street 22
feet to a stake; thence Southerly parallel with the corner of A.J.
Simmons’ wall 70 feet to the North edge of Roseboro Street;
thence Westerly with the North edge of Roseboro Street 22 feet to
the corner of A.J. Simmons’ wall, the beginning corner, making a
lot 22 by 70 feet. This being the same property de4eded by S.B.
Stevens, et al. to M.J. Crumpler, said deed dated July 12, 1913, and
recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Sampson
County in Book 237 at page 48.
TRACT 7:
Adjoining the above-described lot, being the same property
described in deed from R.P. Howell, et al. to M.J. Crumpler, said
deed dated July14, 1913 and recorded in the Office of the Register
of Deeds of Sampson County in Book 237, at Page 50, reference to
which is hereby given and made a part of this description for a
more perfect and complete description of the said tract as bounded
as follows:
BEGINNING at a stake the Southwest corner of D.W. Tart’s lot
(35 x 40 feet) (now owned by W.T. Bryan Estate) bought of R.P.
Howell and wife, Fannie D. Howell of date of July 3, 1913, the
said corner being 40 feet from the West edge of West Street and 80
feet from the North edge of Roseboro Street; thence Northwardly
parallel with West edge of West Street 35 feet to D.W. Tart’s (now
W.T. Bryan Estate) Northwest corner; thence Westwardly parallel
with Roseboro Street 27 ½ feet to a stake J.G. Rayfield Northeast
corner; thence Southerly with J.G. Rayfield line and parallel with
West Street 15 feet to a stake, A.J. Simmons’ corner; thence Eastwardly parallel with Roseboro Street 20 feet to a stake A.J.
Simmons’ Northeast corner; thence Southwardly with A.J.
Simmons’ line and parallel with West Street 20 feet to a stake in
line of 10 feet alleyway; thence Eastwardly parallel with Roseboro
Street 7 1.2 feet to the BEGINNING corner.
and such reformation to relate back to the original recording of the Deed of Trust on February
18, 2000;
(2)
The Court hereby declares that the Medical Property is and has been held by the
Powells in a constructive trust for the benefit of Plaintiff’s Deed of Trust;
(3)
The Court hereby declares that Plaintiff has a valid first lien against the entire
Medical Property, superior to the interests of the Powells; and
(4)
The Court hereby instructs the Sampson County Register of Deeds to record and
index this Judgment in the name of all parties, under both the grantor and grantee indexes.
This the ____ day of ___________________, 2016.
7th
June
_________________________________
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?