Eshelman v. Auerbach et al
Filing
301
ORDER granting in part 255 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 9/18/2018. (Sellers, N.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DNISION
No. 7:16-CV-18-D
FREDRIC N. ESHELMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
The court has considered Puma Biotechnology, Inc.'s motion to seal docket entry 253 and
the exhibits attached thereto [D.E. 255], the memorandum in support [D.E. 256], plaintiff's
opposition [D.E. 269], and the entire record The motion to seal [D.E. 253] is GRANTED in part.
The description in docket entry 253 is not sealed. The exhibits attached to docket entry 253 SHALL
be unsealed in part as set forth in [D.E. 269] including the redacted attachments to [D.E. 269]. See,
e.g., Doe v. Pub. Citizen, 749 F.3d 246, 265-73 (4th Cir. 2014); Va. Dep't of State Police v. Wash.
Po~
386 F.3d 567, 574-81 (4th Cir. 2004).
SO ORDERED. This ...1.8. day of September 2018.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?