Bridgers v. Colvin

Filing 22

ORDER granting 21 Consent Motion for Attorney Fees - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/20/2017. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION 7: 16-cv-253-FL JAMES BRIDGERS, Plaintiff, V. ) ) ) ) ) CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of $2,430.00 for attorney fees, in full and final settlement of all claims due against the Social Security Administration for attorney fees arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the sum of$2,430.00 in attorney fees, in full satisfaction of all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice. This _ _ dayof _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 2017, 20th January United States District Judge CONSENTED TO: Isl CHARLOTTE W. HALL Attorney for Plaintiff N.C. Bar # 41290 Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C. P.O. Box 10629 Raleigh, NC 27605 Telephone: (919) 791-1883 Fax: (919) 791-1886 Isl STEPHEN DMETRUK Attorney for Defendant Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel 6401 Security Boulevard Altmeyer Building, Room 617 Baltimore, Maryland 21235-6401 Telephone: (410) 966-4275 Fax: (410) 597-1435 stephen. Georgia Bar

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?