Coleman's Original Restaurant et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
ORDER granting 20 Motion to Remand. Plaintiffs' request for attorney's fees is DENIED. The action is REMANDED to Brunswick County Superior Court. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 12/21/2016. (Briggeman, N.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
COLEMAN'S ORIGINAL RESTAURANT, )
and PEGGY COLEMAN,
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, )
SCOTTSDALE INDEMNITY COMPANY, )
SCOTTSDALE SURPLUS LINES
RYZE CLAIM SOLUTIONS, LLC,
EAGLE ADJUSTING SERVICES, INC.,
and MICHAEL JOSEPH GERHART,
On September 2, 2016, Coleman's Original Restaurant and Peggy Coleman ("plaintiffs")
moved to remand this action to Brunswick County Superior Court [D.E. 20]. Plaintiffs, North
Carolina citizens, argue that defendant Michael Joseph Gerhart ("Gerhart") is also a North Carolina
citizen and therefore defeats complete diversity. See [D.E. 20], [D.E. 21] 2-9; cf. 28 U.S.C. §
1332(a)(1). On September 23, 2016, defendants responded in opposition and argue that plaintiffs
fraudulently joined Gerhart in order to defeat diversity jurisdiction. See [D.E. 24] 2-12. On
October 11, 2016, plaintiffs replied [D.E. 28].
The court has reviewed the record, North Carolina law, and the parties' arguments
concerning fraudulent joinder. See, e.g., Mayes v. Rapoport, 198 F.3d 457, 461 (4th Cir. 1999);
Hartley v. CSX Trans .. Inc., 187 F .3d 422, 424-25 (4th Cir. 1999); Marshall v. Manville Sales Corp.,
6 F.3d229, 232-33 (4th Cir. 1993); Sampson v. Leonard, No. 4:10-CV-121-D, 2011 WL 129634,
at *2-3 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 12, 2011) (unpublished); Capparelli v. AmeriFirstHomelmp. Fin. Co., 535
F. Supp. 2d554, 559-:-61 (E.D.N.C. 2008). Defendants have failed to "showthattheplaintiffcannot
establish a claim [against Gerhart] even after resolving all issues of law and fact in the plaintiff's
favor." Hartley, 187 F.3d at 424. Stated differently, the record shows that plaintiffs have "a
possibility of a right to relief' against Gerhart and no "outright fraud" appears in plaintiffs'
pleadings. Marshall, 6 F.3d at 33. Thus, the court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction based on
In sum, plaintiffs' motion to remand [D.E. 20] is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' request for
attorney's fees is DENIED. The action is REMANDED to Brunswick County Superior Court.
SO ORDERED. This ...2l_ day of December 2016.
Chief United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?