York v. Social Security Administration

Filing 23

JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act. See [D.E. 17] 6-8. Moreover, to the extent plaintiff seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 405, p laintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See id. at 8-12. Thus, the court GRANTS defendants' motion to dismiss [D.E. 16] and DISMISSES the complaint without prejudice. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 10/12/2017. (Briggeman, N.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM CARL YORK, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE CASE NO. 7:17-CV-23-D ) ) SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) Defendant. ) ) Decision by Court. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act. See [D.E. 17] 6-8. Moreover, to the extent plaintiff seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. ยง 405, plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See id. at 8-12. Thus, the court GRANTS defendants' motion to dismiss [D.E. 16] and DISMISSES the complaint without prejudice. This Judgment Filed and Entered on October 12, 2017, and Copies To: William Carl York (Sent to 617-B N Wilson St. Chadbourn, NC 28431 via US Mail) Rudy E. Renfer (via CM/ECF electronic notification) DATE: October 12, 2017 PETER A. MOORE, JR., CLERK (By) /s/ Nicole Briggeman Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?