York v. Social Security Administration
Filing
23
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act. See [D.E. 17] 6-8. Moreover, to the extent plaintiff seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 405, p laintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See id. at 8-12. Thus, the court GRANTS defendants' motion to dismiss [D.E. 16] and DISMISSES the complaint without prejudice. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 10/12/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
WILLIAM CARL YORK,
Plaintiff,
v.
)
)
)
)
)
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
CASE NO. 7:17-CV-23-D
)
)
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, )
Defendant.
)
)
Decision by Court.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this court lacks subject-matter
jurisdiction over plaintiffs claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act. See [D.E. 17] 6-8.
Moreover, to the extent plaintiff seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. ยง 405, plaintiff has failed to
exhaust his administrative remedies. See id. at 8-12. Thus, the court GRANTS defendants'
motion to dismiss [D.E. 16] and DISMISSES the complaint without prejudice.
This Judgment Filed and Entered on October 12, 2017, and Copies To:
William Carl York
(Sent to 617-B N Wilson St. Chadbourn,
NC 28431 via US Mail)
Rudy E. Renfer
(via CM/ECF electronic notification)
DATE:
October 12, 2017
PETER A. MOORE, JR., CLERK
(By) /s/ Nicole Briggeman
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?