HSG, LLC v. Edge-Works Manufacturing Company, et al

Filing 110

ORDER granting 104 Motion to Seal - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 2/23/2018. (Tripp, S.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION No. 7:17-CV-29-LF HSG, LLC d/b/a “HIGH SPEED GEAR,” Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING EDGE-WORKS’ MOTION TO SEAL v. EDGE-WORKS MANUFACTURING COMPANY d/b/a “G-CODE” et al., Defendants. ORDER Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Seal underacted versions of plaintiff HSG, LLC’s (“HSG”) memorandum in opposition (DE #99) (the “Response”), response to statement of material facts (DE #100) (“SMF Response”), and supporting exhibits (DE #101)(“Response Exhibits”) all under seal (collectively, the “Sealed Documents”). The Court finds that this Motion is filed pursuant to the terms of Section 3(a) and 3(b) of the Protective Order entered on May 8, 2017 (DE #42) and in response to the reasonable procedures seeking compliance therewith as set forth in HSG’s Notice to Court Regarding Proposed Sealed Filings (DE # 102) (the “Notice”). This Court finds that Edge-Works has complied with the terms of the Protective Order by publicly filing contemporaneously with this motion redacted versions of the Sealed Documents. For these reasons, and for good cause shown, the Defendant’s Motion to Seal the proposed Sealed Documents is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the unredacted versions of the Sealed Documents (DE # 99, 100, and 101) shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. 1 23rd February SO ORDERED, this ___ day of ______________, 2018. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?