HSG, LLC v. Edge-Works Manufacturing Company, et al
Filing
110
ORDER granting 104 Motion to Seal - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 2/23/2018. (Tripp, S.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
No. 7:17-CV-29-LF
HSG, LLC d/b/a “HIGH SPEED GEAR,”
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING
EDGE-WORKS’ MOTION TO SEAL
v.
EDGE-WORKS MANUFACTURING
COMPANY d/b/a “G-CODE” et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Seal underacted versions of plaintiff HSG,
LLC’s (“HSG”) memorandum in opposition (DE #99) (the “Response”), response to statement
of material facts (DE #100) (“SMF Response”), and supporting exhibits (DE #101)(“Response
Exhibits”) all under seal (collectively, the “Sealed Documents”). The Court finds that this
Motion is filed pursuant to the terms of Section 3(a) and 3(b) of the Protective Order entered on
May 8, 2017 (DE #42) and in response to the reasonable procedures seeking compliance
therewith as set forth in HSG’s Notice to Court Regarding Proposed Sealed Filings (DE # 102)
(the “Notice”).
This Court finds that Edge-Works has complied with the terms of the Protective Order by
publicly filing contemporaneously with this motion redacted versions of the Sealed Documents.
For these reasons, and for good cause shown, the Defendant’s Motion to Seal the
proposed Sealed Documents is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the unredacted versions of the Sealed Documents (DE
# 99, 100, and 101) shall be SEALED until further order of this Court.
1
23rd
February
SO ORDERED, this ___ day of ______________, 2018.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?