HSG, LLC v. Edge-Works Manufacturing Company, et al
Filing
125
ORDER granting 124 Motion to Withdraw Rule 16 Conference; granting 124 Motion entry and sealing of proposed case management order. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/3/2018. (Collins, S.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
No. 7:17-CV-29-FL
HSG, LLC d/b/a “HIGH SPEED GEAR,”
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION FOR ENTRY AND
SEALING OF CASE MANAGEMENT
ORDER
v.
EDGE-WORKS MANUFACTURING
COMPANY d/b/a “G-CODE” et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Before the Court is the Joint Motion for Entry and Sealing of Proposed Case
Management Order, filed by Defendant Edge-Works Manufacturing Company d/b/a “G-Code”
(hereinafter “Edge-Works”) and Plaintiff HSG, LLC d/b/a High Speed Gear (“HSG”). The
Court finds that this Motion is filed pursuant to the terms of Section 3(a) of the Protective Order
entered on May 18, 2017 [DE 42] and in response to the reasonable procedures seeking
compliance therewith.
This Court finds that Edge-Works and HSG have complied with the terms of the
Protective Order by publicly filing contemporaneously a redacted version of the proposed Case
Management Order (“CMO”) narrowly tailored to remove information that is subject to the
confidentiality provision in the parties’ Global Settlement Agreement.
For these reasons, and for good cause shown, the parties Joint Motion for Entry and
Sealing of Proposed Case Management Order is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the previously filed unredacted version of the CMO
[DE 123] be and remain sealed until further order of this Court.
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the redacted version of the CMO be publically filed
into the Court record.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Edge-Works’ Motion for Rule 16 Conference [DE
120] is denied, without prejudice, as moot.
SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of August, 2018.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?