Poore v. United States of America
Filing
15
ORDER granting 14 Joint Motion to Stay Deadlines Pending Private Mediation - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/13/2018. (Tripp, S.)
IN THE UNTED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
No. 7:18-CV-19-FL
JENNIFER POORE, as Administrator
of the ESTATE OF THOMAS EUGENE
MARTIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER ALLOWING
JOINT MOTION TO STAY
DEADLINES PENDING PRIVATE
MEDIATION
UPON CONSIDERATION of the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay
Deadlines Pending Private Mediation and the entire record,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on this 13th day of Sept.
___
______, 2018,
that the parties’ joint motion is GRANTED:
IT IS ORDERED FURTHER THAT:
1.
Plaintiff will serve responses and/or objections to
Defendant’s First Set of Interrogatories, Defendant’s
First Request for Production of Documents, and
Defendant’s First Request for Admission on or before
September 10, 2018.
2.
Defendant will review and provide all comments and
objections on or before October 1, 2018.
3.
Plaintiff will produce all additional material and/or
objections thereto on or before October 11, 2018.
4.
Mediation with Mr. Beskind will be held in the Office
of the United States Attorney for the Eastern District
of North Carolina on October 30, 2018.
5.
Within seven business days of resolution or impasse
certified by the mediator, the parties shall file with
the court a joint written status update.
6.
If the case does not resolve in mediation, the parties
shall include in the status update their proposed plan
for continued case management and scheduling and shall
file a proposed amended scheduling order complete with
signature block for United States District Court Judge
Louise W. Flanagan.
SO ORDERED.
______________________
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?