Hammonds v. State of North Carolina Department of Transportation of Division of Motor Vehicles

Filing 17

ORDER denying 13 MOTION for Honorable Court to Move Case Forth; denying 14 Motion to Answer; denying 15 MOTION of a Conflict of Interest on a Defendant's Attorney. Plaintiff must respond to defendant's motion to dismiss on or before August 20, 2019. In the event plaintiff fails to respond, the court may grant the motion on the grounds advanced therein. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/6/2019. (A certified copy of this Order was sent via US mail to Danny Ray Hammonds, 24 Aundrea Ave., Lumberton, NC 28358.) (Collins, S.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION NO. 7:19-CV-72-FL DANNY RAY HAMMONDS, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OF DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motions to move the case forth (DE 13), motion to answer (DE 14), and motion of a conflict of interest (DE 15). Where defendant has filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim (DE 9), relief in the form of further case activities as plaintiff now seeks is not warranted. Therefore, plaintiff’s motions are DENIED. Plaintiff’s response to defendant’s motion to dismiss is past due. However, in light of the court’s disposition of the instant motions, the court allows plaintiff an extension of time to file such response. Plaintiff must respond to defendant’s motion to dismiss on or before August 20, 2019. In the event plaintiff fails to respond, the court may grant the motion on the grounds advanced therein. SO ORDERED, this the 6th day of August, 2019. _____________________________ LOUISE W. FLANAGAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?