Eastham v. Port City Contracting Services, Inc. et al

Filing 9

ORDER denying 7 Motion for Reconsideration: The court DENIES Sharpe's motion for reconsideration [D.E. 7] and DISMISSES the appeal for failure to comply with Rule 8009. The case remains closed. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever, III on 9/26/2024. (Pro se party has consented to receiving electronic service of all motions, notices, orders, and documents in civil cases in the Eastern District of North Carolina.) (Lee, L.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DMSION
No. 7:24-MC-3-D
MARK EASTHAM and
PETER SPARK,
Plaintiffs,

v.
PORT CITY CONTRACTING
SERVICES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

On June 27, 2024, the court denied Peter Spark's ("Spark'') motion to withdraw reference
[D.E. 5] andenteredjudgment [D.E. 6]. On June 28, 2024, Spark:filedamotionforreconsideration
[D.E. 7]. On July 3, 3024, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North
Carolina filed a recommendation for dismissal of appeal and deferral of motion for certification of
direct appeal to this court [D.E. 8].
The court has reviewed the entire record

The court DENIES Sharpe's motion for

reconsideration [D.E. 7] and DISMISSES the appeal for failure to comply with Rule 8009. The
case remains closed
SO ORDERED. This

u, day of September, 2024.

JSC.DEVER.ill
United States District Judge