WEBB v. MERCK & CO., INC.

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Judge JAMES A. BEATY JR. on 4/12/06, that the Parties' Consent Motion to Stay All Proceedings Pending Transfer Decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation is GRANTED, and this case is stayed pending a transfer decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Furtherthat Merck shall be responsible for notifying the Court when a transfer decision has been made.(Welch, Kelly)

Download PDF
WEBB v. MERCK & CO., INC. Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA LIZZIE WEBB, Plaintiff, vs. MERCK & CO., INC. Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:06CV00298 ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Consent Motion of Plaintiff Lizzie Webb and Defendant Merck & Co., Inc. ("Merck") (collectively, the "Parties") to stay all proceedings in this action pending a transfer decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation for transfer of this case to a single court for coordinated pre-trial management, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407. This Court has reviewed the Parties' Consent Motion. For good cause shown, and in the interest of judicial economy, it is hereby ORDERED that the Parties' Consent Motion to Stay All Proceedings Pending Transfer Decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation is GRANTED, and this case is stayed pending a transfer decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. It is further ORDERED that Merck shall be responsible for notifying the Court when a transfer decision has been made. This the 12th day of April, 2006. United States District Judge Case 1:06-cv-00298-JAB-WWD Document 9 Filed 04/12/2006 Page 1 of 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?