TISDALE v. BECK
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION: ORDERED that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this order. RECOMMENDED that this action be filed, but then dismissed sua sponte without prejudice. re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by IVORY JOE TISDALE,. Objections to R&R due by 5/24/2006. Signed by Magistrate Judge P. TREVOR SHARP on 5/10/06. (Butler, Carol)
TISDALE v. BECK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Ivory Joe Tisdale, Petitioner, v. Theodis Beck, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Petitioner, a prisoner of the State of North Carolina, has submitted a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody. The Clerk of Court received the submission on April 17, 2006. For the following reasons, the petition cannot be further processed. 1. Petitioner has filed one habeas petition which is pending in this Court at this time. (No. 1:05CV1012) Petitioner may not file a second or successive habeas petition. His remedy is to file a motion to amend his pending petition if he wishes to add claims and receive permission to do so from the Court. An insufficient number of copies was furnished. Petitioner must submit the original and two copies. [Attached instructions and Rule 3(a), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases.]
Because of these pleading failures, this particular petition should be filed and then dismissed, without prejudice to petitioner seeking to amend his pending petition.
Page 1 of 2
In forma pauperis status will be granted for the sole purpose of entering this order and recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this order. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be filed, but then dismissed sua sponte without prejudice.
/s/ P. Trevor Sharp United States Magistrate Judge
Date: May 10, 2006
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?