EVANS et al v. DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF et al

Filing 114

Suggestion of Subsequently Decided Authority re 42 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendants DAVID ADDISON, PATRICK BAKER, STEVEN W. CHALMERS, BEVERLY COUNCIL, DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF, MARK GOTTLIEB, BENJAMIN HIMAN, RONALD HODGE, JEFF LAMB, MICHAEL RIPBERGER, LEE RUSS. (GILLESPIE, REGINALD)

EVANS et al v. DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF et al

Doc. 114

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-00739 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DAVID F. EVANS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, et al., Defendants.

CITY DEFENDANTS' SUGGESTION OF SUBSEQUENTLY DECIDED AUTHORITY

NOW COME Defendants the City of Durham, North Carolina, Mark Gottlieb, Benjamin Himan, Patrick Baker, Steven Chalmers, Ronald Hodge, Lee Russ, Beverly Council, Jeff Lamb, Michael Ripberger, and David Addison (collectively, the "City Defendants"), herein by and through their respective counsel of record, and pursuant to LR7.3(i), MDNC, submit this suggestion of subsequently decided authority. The following published cases were decided subsequent to the City Defendants' filing of their briefs and reply briefs in support of their motions to dismiss (consolidated at Doc. No. 42) and the City Defendants respectfully draw the Court's attention to them: Monroe v. City of Charlottesville, 579 F.3d 380 (4th Cir. 2009), and Francis v. Giacomelli, 588 F.3d 186 (4th Cir. 2009).

Case 1:07-cv-00739-JAB-WWD Document 114

Filed 01/07/10 Page 1 of 4

Dockets.Justia.com

Respectfully submitted, this the 7th day of January, 2010. FAISON & GILLESPIE By: /s/ Reginald B. Gillespie, Jr. Reginald B. Gillespie, Jr. North Carolina State Bar No. 10895 5517 Chapel Hill Boulevard, Suite 2000 Post Office Box 51729 Durham, North Carolina 27717 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant City of Durham, North Carolina STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP By: /s/ Roger E. Warin Roger E. Warin* Michael A. Vatis* Matthew J. Herrington* John P. Nolan* Leah M. Quadrino* 1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 Telephone : [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] *Motion for Special Appearance to be filed Attorneys for Defendant City of Durham, North Carolina

-2Case 1:07-cv-00739-JAB-WWD Document 114 Filed 01/07/10 Page 2 of 4

POYNER SPRUILL LLP By: /s/ Eric P. Stevens David W. Long North Carolina State Bar No. 2779 Eric P. Stevens North Carolina State Bar No. 17609 Post Office Box 1801 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-1801 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant Mark Gottlieb KENNON, CRAVER, BELO, CRAIG & MCKEE PLLC By: /s/ Joel M. Craig Joel M. Craig North Carolina State Bar No. 9179 Henry W. Sappenfield North Carolina State Bar No. 37419 4011 University Drive, Suite 300 Post Office Box 51579 Durham, North Carolina 27717-1579 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant Benjamin Himan MAXWELL, FREEMAN & BOWMAN, PA By: /s/ James B. Maxwell James B. Maxwell North Carolina State Bar No. 2933 Post Office Box 52396 Durham, North Carolina 27717 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant David Addison -3Case 1:07-cv-00739-JAB-WWD Document 114 Filed 01/07/10 Page 3 of 4

TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP By: /s/ Patricia P. Kerner Patricia P. Kerner North Carolina State Bar No. 13005 Hannah G. Styron North Carolina State Bar No. 28824 D. Martin Warf North Carolina State Bar No. 32982 434 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1900 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants Baker, Chalmers, Hodge, Russ, Council, Lamb, and Ripberger

CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC FILING AND SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that, pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and LR5.3 and LR5.4, MDNC, the foregoing pleading, motion, affidavit, notice, or other document/paper has been electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which system will automatically generate and send a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) to the undersigned filing user and registered users of record, and that the Court's electronic records show that each party to this action is represented by at least one registered user of record (or that the party is a registered user of record), to each of whom the NEF will be transmitted. This the 7th day of January, 2010. FAISON & GILLESPIE By: /s/ Reginald B. Gillespie, Jr. Reginald B. Gillespie, Jr. North Carolina State Bar No. 10895 Attorneys for Defendant City of Durham, North Carolina

-4Case 1:07-cv-00739-JAB-WWD Document 114 Filed 01/07/10 Page 4 of 4