EVANS et al v. DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF et al
Filing
57
ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 4/30/2008 that Ilann M. Maazel, and Richard D. Emery be, and thereby are, admitted to this Court, pro hac vice, and that Ilann M. Maazel, and Richard D. Emery, David S. Rudolf and the law firm Rudolf, Widenhouse & Fialko be noted as counsel of record for Plaintiff Reade Seligmann. (Lee, Lisa)
EVANS et al v. DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF et al
Doc. 57
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CASE NO. 1:07CV739 ) DAVID F. EVANS, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) THE CITY OF DURHAM, NC; ) STEVEN CHALMERS; BEVERLY ) COUNCIL; RONALD HODGE; ) JEFF LAMB; STEPHEN MIHAICH; ) MICHAEL RIPBERGER; LEE RUSS; ) DAVID ADDISON; MARK ) GOTTLIEB; BENJAMIN HIMAN; ) DNA SECURITY, INC.; RICHARD ) CLARK; BRIAN MEEHAN; ) LINWOOD WILSON; and ) MICHAEL B. NIFONG, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO BE ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Ilann M. Maazel, and Richard D. Emery be, and thereby are, admitted to this Court, pro hac vice, and that Ilann M. Maazel, and Richard D. Emery, David S. Rudolf and the law firm Rudolf, Widenhouse & Fialko be noted as counsel of record for Plaintiff Reade Seligmann. This the 30th day of April, 2008.
United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?