EVANS et al v. DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF et al

Filing 58

ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 4/30/2008 that on 54 motion of Defendants DNA Security, Inc. and Richard Clark, and pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and LR6.2(a), MDNC, it is hereby ordered that the time within which the moving Defendants may file and serve their reply brief in support of their motion to dismiss be, and such time hereby is, enlarged, through and including May 9, 2008. (Lee, Lisa)

Download PDF
EVANS et al v. DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF et al Doc. 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07CV739 DAVID F. EVANS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, et al., Defendants. __________________________________ ) ) ) ) ORDER ENLARGING TIME ) FOR REPLY BRIEF ) ) ) ) ) ) FOR CAUSE SHOWN, on motion of Defendants DNA Security, Inc. and Richard Clark, and pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and LR6.2(a), MDNC, it is hereby ordered that the time within which the moving Defendants may file and serve their reply brief in support of their motion to dismiss be, and such time hereby is, enlarged, through and including May 9, 2008. This the 30th day of April, 2008. United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?