MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 213

ORDER that the Motion to Expedite [Doc. #207 ] is GRANTED, and that with respect to the City Defendants' motion for stay of proceedings and supporting brief filed on May 13, 2011, any Response, including brief, shall be filed on or before midnight on May 24, 2011, and any Reply shall be filed on or before midnight on May 27, 2011. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR., on 5/18/2011. (Lapira, Sharon)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07CV953 RYAN MCFADYEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER EXPEDITING DEADLINES FOR FILING RESPONSE AND REPLY WITH RESPECT TO MOTION FOR STAY This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Expedite [Doc. #207] filed by Defendant the City of Durham, North Carolina, and the individual City Defendants Patrick Baker, Steven Chalmers, Beverly Council, Ronald Hodge, Jeff Lamb, Lee Russ, Michael Ripberger, David Addison, Mark Gottlieb, and Benjamin Himan (collectively, the “City Defendants”) pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 6(c), and LR7.3(f), MDNC, and with consent of counsel to Plaintiffs. The Court finds that good cause exists to allow the Motion to Expedite. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion to Expedite [Doc. #207] is GRANTED, and that with respect to the City Defendants’ motion for stay of proceedings and supporting brief filed on May 13, 2011, any Response, including brief, shall be filed on or before midnight on May 24, 2011, and any Reply shall be filed on or before midnight on May 27, 2011. This, the 18th day of May, 2011. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?