MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 219

*** WITHDRAWN *** ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE WALLACE W. DIXON on 6/10/2011, that on motion of Defendant the City of Durham, North Carolina (the "City"), and pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b) and LR6.1(a), MDNC it is hereby ORDERED that the time within which the City and its former and present personnel who are named as Defendants and Defendant Linwood Wilson may answer or otherwise plead or respond to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Doc. no. #136 ), shall be, and such time hereby is, ENLARGED, through and including July 14, 2011. Answer due by 7/14/2011.(Daniel, J) Modified on 2/6/2012 to add text to reflect "WITHDRAWN". See Minute Entry entered 6/13/2011 by Mag/Judge Wallace W. Dixon. (Lloyd, Donna)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07CV953 RYAN MCFADYEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ENLARGING TIME WITHIN WHICH CITY DEFENDANTS AND LINWOOD WILSON MAY MAY ANSWER PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b), LR6.1(a), MDNC FOR CAUSE SHOWN, on motion of Defendant the City of Durham, North Carolina (the "City"), and pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b) and LR6.1(a), MDNC it is hereby ORDERED that the time within which the City and its former and present personnel who are named as Defendants and Defendant Linwood Wilson may answer or otherwise plead or respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (Doc. no. 136), shall be, and such time hereby is, ENLARGED, through and including July 14, 2011. This the 10th day of June, 2011. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?