MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 266

ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE P. TREVOR SHARP on 1/19/2012, that Defendants' motion for leave to exceed page limitation (Docket No. #264 ) is GRANTED and that the Court accepts the Reply Brief, as filed, notwithstanding its noncompliance with Local Rule 7.3(d). (Lloyd, Donna)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

RYAN McFAYDEN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:07CV953

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO EXCEED
PAGE LIMITATION IN REPLY BRIEF

This matter came before the Court upon the consent motion of Defendants Duke
University, Robert Dean, Matthew Drummond, Aaron Graves, and Gary N. Smith (the “Duke
Defendants”) for an order allowing them to file a reply brief in excess of the page limitation
set forth in Local Rule 7.3(d) of the United States District Court for the Middle District of
North Carolina, and accepting the Duke Defendants’ Reply Brief in Further Support of
Motion for Protective Order Concerning Plaintiffs’ Subpoenas Addressed to BursonMarsteller and Edelman, Docket No. 261 (the “Reply Brief”) as filed. For good cause
shown,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for leave to exceed page limitation
(Docket No. 264) is GRANTED and that the Court accepts the Reply Brief, as filed,
notwithstanding its noncompliance with Local Rule 7.3(d).

This the 19th day of January, 2012.

/s/ P. Trevor Sharp
United States Magistrate Judge

-2-