MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 03/25/08, granting #23 Motion to Exceed Page Limit, that the Joint Motion is GRANTED to the extent set out herein; Each of the Defendants or Defendant-groups enumerated below, as defined in the Joint Motion, shall have up to and including 50 pages to brief their respective motions to dismiss ("Motions"), and up to and including 25 pages to brief their respective reply memoranda ("Replies"): Duke University Defendants; Duke SANE Defendants; The City of Durham, NC; Durham Police Supervising Defendants; Durham Police Defendants; Edward Sarvis; Ronald Hodge; Mark Gottlieb; Benjamin W. Himan; DNA Security, Inc. and Richard Clark; and Brian Meehan. Defendants or Defendant-groups may elect to file their Motions or Replies jointly, but may not aggregate the page limits applicable to their respective Motions and Replies. Plaintiffs may file a response brief ("Response") in response to each Motion that is filed, and shall have up to and including 50 pages to brief each Response. Plaintiffs may elect to address multiple Motions in a given Response, but may not aggregate the page limits applicable to Responses. The following briefing schedule shall apply to the Motions, Responses and Replies in this matter: Motions/Answers due: April 25, 2008; Responses due: 90 days after filing of Motions; and Replies due: 30 days after filing of Responses. (Law, Trina)

MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Doc. 29

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA RYAN McFADYEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. Case No: 1:07CV953

ORDER Upon consideration of the Joint Motion to Extend Page Limitations and to Establish a Rule 12 Briefing Schedule ("Joint Motion") [Document #23], for good cause shown and by agreement of the parties to the Joint Motion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. 2. The Joint Motion is GRANTED to the extent set out herein; Each of the Defendants or Defendant-groups enumerated below, as defined in

the Joint Motion, shall have up to and including 50 pages to brief their respective motions to dismiss ("Motions"), and up to and including 25 pages to brief their respective reply memoranda ("Replies"): a. b. c. d. e. Duke University Defendants; Duke SANE Defendants; The City of Durham, NC; Durham Police Supervising Defendants; Durham Police Defendants;

Dockets.Justia.com

f. g. h. i. j. k. 3.

Edward Sarvis; Ronald Hodge; Mark Gottlieb; Benjamin W. Himan; DNA Security, Inc. and Richard Clark; and Brian Meehan.

Defendants or Defendant-groups may elect to file their Motions or Replies jointly,

but may not aggregate the page limits applicable to their respective Motions and Replies. 4. Plaintiffs may file a response brief ("Response") in response to each Motion that

is filed, and shall have up to and including 50 pages to brief each Response. Plaintiffs may elect to address multiple Motions in a given Response, but may not aggregate the page limits applicable to Responses. 5. in this matter: a. b. c. Motions/Answers due: Responses due: Replies due: April 25, 2008; 90 days after filing of Motions; and 30 days after filing of Responses. The following briefing schedule shall apply to the Motions, Responses and Replies

So ORDERED on this 25th day of March, 2008.

United States District Judge

2