MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 298

ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 9/24/2012; that Plaintiffs' Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Defendants' Requests for Admissions [Doc. #295 ] is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs have to and including September 25, 2012, within which to respond to Defendants' discovery requests. FURTHER that the Joint Motion to Extend Discovery Period Solely to Secure an Affidavit from Plaintiff Breck Archer and Obtain Attorney Billing Records for Plaintiffs Ryan McFadyen and Matthew Wilson [Doc. #296 ] is GRANTED, and the discovery period is extended to September 25, 2012 for those specified purposes. Discovery due by 9/25/2012. (Sheets, Jamie)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA RYAN McFADYEN, et al. Plaintiffs, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:07CV953 ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion [Doc. #295] for an extension of time to respond to Defendants’ discovery requests, and a Joint Motion [Doc. #296] to extent the discovery period solely to obtain an affidavit and certain billing records. Defendants consent to the Motions. The Court has reviewed the Motions and concludes that good cause exists to allow the requested extensions. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Defendants’ Requests for Admissions [Doc. #295] is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs have to and including September 25, 2012, within which to respond to Defendants’ discovery requests. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Extend Discovery Period Solely to Secure an Affidavit from Plaintiff Breck Archer and Obtain Attorney Billing Records for Plaintiffs Ryan McFadyen and Matthew Wilson [Doc. #296] is GRANTED, and the discovery period is extended to September 25, 2012 for those specified purposes. This, the 24th day of September, 2012. /s/ Joi Elizabeth Peake United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?