MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 328

REPLY, filed by Defendant LINWOOD WILSON, to Response to #324 MOTION to Dismiss Causes 5 and 18 filed by LINWOOD WILSON. (WILSON, LINWOOD)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 1:07cv953 RYAN MCFADYEN, et al., Plaintiffs, Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to and Motion to Stay Defendant Wilson’s Motion to Dismiss Causes of Action: 5 and 18 based on 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling or December 17, 2012 v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants, DEFENDANT WILSON’S REPLY SUPPORTING HIS MOTION TO DISMISS REMAINING CAUSES OF ACTION 5 AND 18 AS A RESULT OF 4TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS RULING AND RECENT MANDATE Defendant Wilson concedes that the Mandate stayed by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals based on Plaintiffs’ request for reconsideration by the Fourth Circuit en banc and any further appellate review, Appeal: 11-1458 Doc: 79 STAY OF MANDATE UNDER FED. R. APP. P. 41(d)(1), thereby stays Defendant Wilson’s Motion to Dismiss Doc. 324. Respectfully submitted, this the 13th day of January 2013. By: /s/ Linwood E. Wilson Linwood E. Wilson Pro Se 1 CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC FILING AND SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that, pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and LR5.3 and LR5.4, MDNC, the foregoing pleading, motion, affidavit, notice, or other document/paper has been electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which system will automatically generate and send a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) to the undersigned filing user and registered users of record, and that the Court's electronic records show that each party to this action is represented by at least one registered user of record (or that the party is a registered user of record), to each of whom the NEF will be transmitted. This the 13th day of January 2013. By: /s/ Linwood E. Wilson Linwood E. Wilson Pro Se 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?