MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 349

MOTION to Dismiss Document 348 without prejudice by LINWOOD E. WILSON. Responses due by 3/31/2014 (WILSON, LINWOOD) Modified on 3/10/2014 to construe Motion to Dismiss as a Notice of Withdrawal.(Kemp, Donita)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 1:07cv953 RYAN MCFADYEN, et al., Plaintiffs, Motion for Dismissal of Document 348 MOTION for Sanctions Memorandum and Motion For Rule 11: Sanctions v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants, NOW COMES Defendant Linwood E. Wilson with Motion dismissing Document 348, without prejudice to refile, which was filed mistakenly and prematurely on March 5, 2014. Pursuant to the FRCP the Plaintiffs and their Attorneys have 21 days after being served with the Motion to correct or rectify any wrongs done in the Motion for Rule 11: Sanctions. Defendant Wilson is mailing to Plaintiffs, by and through their Attorneys of Record, and their Attorneys the Motion for Rule 11: Sanctions this date by US Postal Service. Regrettably, /s/Linwood E. Wilson, Pro Se Linwood E. Wilson 1 CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC FILING AND SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that, pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and LR5.3 and LR5.4, MDNC, the foregoing pleading, motion, affidavit, notice, or other document/paper has been electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which system will automatically generate and send a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) to the undersigned filing user and registered users of record, and that the Court's electronic records show that each party to this action is represented by at least one registered user of record (or that the party is a registered user of record), to each of whom the NEF will be transmitted. This the 5th day of March 2014. By: /s/ Linwood E. Wilson Linwood E. Wilson Pro Se 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?