MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 68

RESPONSE in Opposition re #66 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #54 Memorandum, #48 Memorandum, #40 MOTION to Dismiss, #47 MOTION to Dismiss by Duke SANE Defendants, #53 MOTION to Dismiss, #61 MOTION to Dismiss, #56 Memorandum, #46 Memorandum filed by LINWOOD WILSON. Replies due by 10/20/2008. (WILSON, LINWOOD)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA RYAN MCFADYEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. LINWOOD WILSON'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXTEND TIME Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00953 1. For the reason stated in City of Durham Defendants Joint Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion For Extension of Time (Document 67), Defendant Linwood Wilson asks the court to be joined with the City Defendants in Opposition to Extension of Time by Plaintiffs' in Plaintiffs' Motion Document No. 66. 2. Finally, Plaintiffs' counsel states that he "has contacted and attempted to consulted [sic] with the Defendants' counsel" about an extension of time. In fact, though he has never attempted to contact Defendant Wilson who is pro se in this matter. WHEREFORE, Defendant Wilson requests that the Court deny Plaintiffs' Motion For Extension of Time. Dated: October 2, 2008 Respectfully submitted, BY: /s/ LINWOOD E. WILSON LINWOOD E. WILSON **Address Redacted Pursuant to Local Rule CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC FILING AND SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that, pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and LR5.3 and LR5.4, MDNC, the foregoing pleading, motion, affidavit, notice, or other document/paper has been electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which system will automatically generate and send a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) to the undersigned filing user and registered users of record, and that the Court's electronic records show that each party to this action is represented by at least one registered user of record, to each of whom the NEF will be transmitted. This the 2nd day of October, 2008. By: /s/ Linwood Wilson Linwood E. Wilson, Pro Se **Address Redacted Pursuant to Local Rule

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?