CARRINGTON et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 20

NOTICE of Appearance by attorney REGINALD B. GILLESPIE, JR on behalf of Defendant CITY OF DURHAM (GILLESPIE, REGINALD)

Download PDF
CARRINGTON et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-00119 EDWARD CARRINGTON, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Reginald B. Gillespie, Jr., of the law firm Faison & Gillespie, hereby gives notice of and enters his appearance in the above-captioned action on behalf of Defendant the City of Durham, North Carolina. The undersigned respectfully requests that his name be added to the CM/ECF system with respect to this action, and that copies of all motions, pleadings, affidavits, notices, orders, and other documents/papers filed or served in this action be transmitted to him. This the 29th day of February, 2008. FAISON & GILLESPIE By: /s/ Reginald B. Gillespie, Jr. Reginald B. Gillespie, Jr. North Carolina State Bar No. 10895 Attorneys for Defendant the City of Durham, North Carolina Post Office Box 51729 [27717-1729] 5517 Chapel Hill Boulevard, Suite 2000 Durham, North Carolina 27707 Telephone: (919) 489-9001 Fax: (919) 489-5774 E-Mail: rgillespie@faison-gillespie.com Dockets.Justia.com CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC FILING AND SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that, pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and LR5.3 and LR5.4, MDNC, the foregoing pleading, motion, affidavit, notice, or other document/paper has been electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which system will automatically generate and send a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) to the undersigned filing user and registered users of record, and that the Court's electronic records show that each party to this action is represented by at least one registered user of record, to each of whom the NEF will be transmitted, except that, with respect to the following parties, a copy is being transmitted via first class mail to the address listed below: Mr. Dan J. McLamb Yates, McLamb & Weyher, L.L.P. One Bank of America Plaza 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 Counsel for Defendants Duke University Health System, Inc., Tara Levicy, and Theresa Arico Mr. Linwood Wilson Pro Se [Home Address redacted per LR 7.1(b), MDNC and ECF P&P Manual, part J] and Mr. Linwood Wilson Pro Se c/o 120 East Parrish Street, Suite 210 Post Office Box 2301 Durham, North Carolina 27702 Mr. J. Wesley Covington Bryant, Patterson, Covington, Lewis & Lindsley, P.A. Post Office Box 341 Durham, North Carolina 27702 Mr. Edwin M. Speas Poyner & Spruill LLP 3600 Glenwood Avenue Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 Counsel for Defendant Mark Gottlieb CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC FILING AND SERVICE CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE -2- Mr. Joel M. Craig Kennon, Craver, Belo, Craig & Mckee, PLLC 4011 University Drive, Suite 300 Post Office Box 51579 Durham, North Carolina 27717-1579 Counsel for Defendant Benjamin Himan Ms. Patricia P. Kerner Troutman Sanders LLP 434 Fayetteville Street Mall Two Hannover Square, Suite 1100 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 Counsel for Defendants Patrick Baker, Steven Chalmers, Ronald Hodge, Lee Russ, Stephen Mihaich, Beverly Council, Jeff Lamb, and Michael Ripberger Mr. James B. Maxwell Maxwell, Freeman & Bowman, P.A. Post Office Box 52396 Durham, North Carolina 27717 Counsel for Defendant David Addison This the 29th day of February, 2008. FAISON & GILLESPIE By: /s/ Reginald B. Gillespie, Jr. Reginald B. Gillespie, Jr. North Carolina State Bar No. 10895 Attorneys for Defendant the City of Durham, North Carolina Post Office Box 51729 [27717-1729] 5517 Chapel Hill Boulevard, Suite 2000 Durham, North Carolina 27707 Telephone: (919) 489-9001 Fax: (919) 489-5774 E-Mail: rgillespie@faison-gillespie.com RBGjr:ms 8838-34\P\001 NOA -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?