CARRINGTON et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
Filing
85
ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 7/25/2008 that Plaintiffs' 83 Motion to Clarify or In the Alternative for An Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant Linwood Wilson's Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss is granted. Plaintiffs' response is due August 28, 2008. Plaintiffs shall follow the page limits set forth in the April 14, 2008 scheduling order for the purpose of responding to Defendant Linwood Wilson's Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss. (Lee, Lisa)
<![CDATA[
CARRINGTON et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
Doc. 85
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 1:08cv119 ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) DUKE UNIVERSITY, et. al. ) ) Defendants. ) ) _________________________________ ) ORDER For the reasons stated therein and for good cause shown, Plaintiffs' Motion to Clarify or In the Alternative for An Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant Linwood Wilson's Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss is granted. Plaintiffs' response is due August 28, 2008. Plaintiffs shall follow the page limits set forth in the April 14, 2008 scheduling order for the purpose of responding to Defendant Linwood Wilson's Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss. This the 25th day of July, 2008. EDWARD CARRINGTON, et. al.
United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
