CARRINGTON et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 98

ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 9/4/2008 granting 87 Consent Motion for L. Cooper Harrell Esq. and Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP to Withdraw as Attorney of record for defendants Duke University, Richard H. Brodhead, Peter Lange, Larry Moneta, John Burness, Tallman Trask, Suzanne Wasiolek, Matthew Drummond, Aaron Graves, Robert Dean, Kate Hendricks, and Victor J. Dzau. (Lee, Lisa)

Download PDF
CARRINGTON et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al Doc. 98 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Case No. 1:08cv119 EDWARD CARRINGTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. PRESENTLY BEFORE THE COURT is the consent motion of L. Cooper Harrell, Esq. and Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP (formerly Smith Moore LLP) to withdraw from this case as counsel of record for defendants Duke University, Richard H. Brodhead, Peter Lange, Larry Moneta, John Burness, Tallman Trask, Suzanne Wasiolek, Matthew Drummond, Aaron Graves, Robert Dean, Kate Hendricks, and Victor J. Dzau (the "Duke University Defendants"). Based on the motion submitted to the Court, and it appearing that the Duke University Defendants consent to the entry of this Order, the Court finds good cause for allowing L. Cooper Harrell and Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP to withdraw as counsel of record. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, for good cause shown, that the motion of L. Cooper Harrell and the law firm of Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP (formerly Smith Moore LLP) to withdraw as counsel of record for the Duke University Defendants is GRANTED and that L. Cooper Harrell and the law firm ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD Dockets.Justia.com of Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP are fully discharged from representation of the Duke University Defendants in this matter and have no further responsibility with regard to this case. This the 4th day of September, 2008. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?