STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC. v. SUMMIX, INC.

Filing 78

ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 05/14/2012. The court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 63] is granted in part and denied in p art in that the Court enters summary judgment for Defendant on Plaintiff's claim for "Violation of the North Carolina Trade Secrets ProtectionAct N.C.G.S. 66-153" [Doc. 51 , 22-31] but not on Plaintiff's claims for "Breach of Contract and Warranty of Merchantability - Developer Rollers" [id. 16-21] and "Breach of Contract and Warranty of Merchantability - PCRs" [id. 10-15] or on Defendant's counterclaim for breach of contract. (Taylor, Abby)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. SUMMIX, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:08CV928 ORDER The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on April 20, 2012, was served on the parties in this action. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by § 636. The court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 63] is granted in part and denied in part in that the Court enters summary judgment for Defendant on Plaintiff’s claim for “Violation of the North Carolina Trade Secrets Protection Act N.C.G.S. 66-153” [Doc. 51, ¶¶ 22-31] but not on Plaintiff’s claims for “Breach of Contract and Warranty of Merchantability - Developer Rollers” [id. ¶¶ 16-21] and “Breach of Contract and Warranty of Merchantability - PCRs” [id. ¶¶ 10-15] or on Defendant’s counterclaim for breach of contract. United States District Judge Date: May 14, 2012 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?