STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC. v. SUMMIX, INC.
Filing
78
ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 05/14/2012. The court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 63] is granted in part and denied in p art in that the Court enters summary judgment for Defendant on Plaintiff's claim for "Violation of the North Carolina Trade Secrets ProtectionAct N.C.G.S. 66-153" [Doc. 51 , 22-31] but not on Plaintiff's claims for "Breach of Contract and Warranty of Merchantability - Developer Rollers" [id. 16-21] and "Breach of Contract and Warranty of Merchantability - PCRs" [id. 10-15] or on Defendant's counterclaim for breach of contract. (Taylor, Abby)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS,
INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
SUMMIX, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:08CV928
ORDER
The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on April 20, 2012, was served on the parties in this
action. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by § 636.
The court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
[Doc. 63] is granted in part and denied in part in that the Court enters summary judgment for
Defendant on Plaintiff’s claim for “Violation of the North Carolina Trade Secrets Protection
Act N.C.G.S. 66-153” [Doc. 51, ¶¶ 22-31] but not on Plaintiff’s claims for “Breach of Contract
and Warranty of Merchantability - Developer Rollers” [id. ¶¶ 16-21] and “Breach of Contract
and Warranty of Merchantability - PCRs” [id. ¶¶ 10-15] or on Defendant’s counterclaim for
breach of contract.
United States District Judge
Date: May 14, 2012
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?