BARBEE v. KELLER
Filing
14
ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 11/21/2012, that the Court has reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge 39;s report. The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation in full. ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5 ) is GRANTED and that the Habeas Petition (Doc. 2 ) is DISMISSED. A Judgment dismissi ng this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued. (Taylor, Abby)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
DARRELL WADE BARBEE,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Petitioner,
v.
ALVIN W. KELLER, JR.,
Respondent.
1:11CV238
O-R-D-E-R
The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b) and, on Oct. 9, 2012, was served on the parties in this action.
Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation. (Doc. 13.)
The Court has reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge=s report to which objection
was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge=s
report. The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge=s recommendation in full.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5) is
GRANTED and that the Habeas Petition (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED. A Judgment dismissing this
action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. Finding no substantial issue for appeal
concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural
ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued.
This the 21st day of November, 2012.
_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?