PAGE et al v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. et al

Filing 18

ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR., on 9/30/2013, that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 15 ) is ADOPTED. FURTHER, that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 2 ) is GRANTED and that this action is dismissed. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Lloyd, Donna)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

ROSINA MARIE PAGE and
JERCKARRA PAGE,
Plaintiff,
v.
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING,
INC., US NATIONAL BANK
ASSOCIATION, and JOHN AND
JANE DOES 1-25,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:12CV900

ORDER
This matter is before this court for review of the
Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation (ARecommendation@) filed on
August 30, 2013, by the Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28
U.S.C. § 636(b).

(Doc. 15.)

In the Recommendation, the

Magistrate Judge recommends that the Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim be
granted.
The Recommendation was served on the parties to this action
on August 30, 2013.

Plaintiff Jerckaara Page filed objection to

the Recommendation on September 16, 2013.

(Doc. 17.)

The

objection as filed only appears to object to the authority of

the Magistrate Judge to enter the recommendation or,
alternatively, is only a general objection.
Nevertheless, this court has made Aa de novo determination
of those portions of the [Magistrate Judge=s] report or specified
proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.@
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

This court Amay accept, reject, or

modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations
made by the [M]agistrate [J]udge. . . . [O]r recommit the matter
to the [M]agistrate [J]udge with instructions.@

Id.

This court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the
Recommendation to which objection was made and has made a
de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate
Judge’s Recommendation.

This court therefore adopts the

Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge=s
Recommendation (Doc. 15) is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 2) is GRANTED and that this
action is dismissed.

A Judgment dismissing this action will be

entered contemporaneously with this Order.
This the 30th day of September, 2013.

________________________________________
United States District Judge
- 2 -