KING v. INTERNAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC.

Filing 18

ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR. on 4/29/2013, adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (doc. 13 ); that to the extent Defendant's Answer has been docketed as a "Motion to Dismiss" (Doc. 4 ), that Motion is DENIED without prejudice to dispositive motions being filed in compliance with the Local Rules and with the required briefing at the appropriate time. Defendant's Answer shall otherwise remain on the docket with full effect. The Motion to Dismiss for insufficient service of process is DISMISSED without prejudice at this time since the time for service has not yet run and the motion has not been properly presented in compliancewith the Local Rules. (Lloyd, Donna)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

LAUREN KING,
Plaintiff,
v.
INTERNAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:12CV1292

ORDER
On March 18, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge’s
Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.

(Docs. 13 and 14.)

No objections

were filed within the time limits prescribed by Section 636.
Therefore, the court need not make a de novo review and the
Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is hereby adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that to the extent Defendant’s
Answer has been docketed as a “Motion to Dismiss” (Doc. 4), that
Motion is DENIED without prejudice to dispositive motions being
filed in compliance with the Local Rules and with the required
briefing at the appropriate time.

Defendant’s Answer shall

otherwise remain on the docket with full effect.

The Motion to

Dismiss for insufficient service of process is DISMISSED without
prejudice at this time since the time for service has not yet

run and the motion has not been properly presented in compliance
with the Local Rules.
This the 29th day of April, 2013.

_______________________________________
United States District Judge

- 2 -