REESE v. JOYNER
Filing
22
ORDER signed by JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 9/25/2014, adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. # 18 ], that Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 9 ] is GRANTED, the Petition [Doc. # 1 ] is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED, and that, finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. (Butler, Carol)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EDWARD NATHANIEL REESE,
Petitioner,
v.
OLIVER WASHINGTON, Administrator,
Warren Correctional Institution,1
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:13CV149
ORDER
On September 8, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed
and notice was served on Petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed objections
[Doc. #20] to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The Court
has reviewed Petitioner’s objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the
United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation [Doc. #18], which is affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment
[Doc. #9] is GRANTED, the Petition [Doc. #1] is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED,
and that, finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right
1
Respondent has noted that on or about May 29, 2014, Petitioner was transferred from Harnett
Correctional Institution to Warren Correctional Institution. Respondent agrees that Petitioner’s current custodian,
and thus now the proper respondent to this action, is Oliver Washington, Administrator of Warren Correctional
Institution.
affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is
DENIED.
This, the 25th day of September, 2014.
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?