REESE v. JOYNER

Filing 22

ORDER signed by JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 9/25/2014, adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. # 18 ], that Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 9 ] is GRANTED, the Petition [Doc. # 1 ] is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED, and that, finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. (Butler, Carol)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EDWARD NATHANIEL REESE, Petitioner, v. OLIVER WASHINGTON, Administrator, Warren Correctional Institution,1 Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:13CV149 ORDER On September 8, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed and notice was served on Petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed objections [Doc. #20] to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The Court has reviewed Petitioner’s objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation [Doc. #18], which is affirmed and adopted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #9] is GRANTED, the Petition [Doc. #1] is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED, and that, finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right 1 Respondent has noted that on or about May 29, 2014, Petitioner was transferred from Harnett Correctional Institution to Warren Correctional Institution. Respondent agrees that Petitioner’s current custodian, and thus now the proper respondent to this action, is Oliver Washington, Administrator of Warren Correctional Institution. affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. This, the 25th day of September, 2014. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?